Caitlin Clark has become so central to the WNBA conversation that even when she is not featured, she somehow still becomes the story anyway. That was the case Sunday after the WNBA posted a promotional graphic on X for a nationally televised doubleheader featuring the Indiana Fever and Seattle Storm alongside the Las Vegas Aces and Atlanta Dream. Fans quickly noticed something that immediately dominated the discussion surrounding the graphic: Clark was nowhere to be found.
Instead, the WNBA used rookie guard Raven Johnson alongside Zia Cooke for the Fever-Storm matchup, while the earlier game featured stars A'ja Wilson and Angel Reese. That decision immediately triggered strong reactions online, especially considering Clark’s massive popularity entering the 2026 season.
Caitlin Clark graphic sparks wave of backlash
The backlash came quickly from fans, commentators, and media personalities who viewed the omission as a major marketing mistake by the league. There="" is="" no="" conclusion="" to="" make="" other="" than="" the="" @WNBA="" hates="" Caitlin="" Clark="" by="" today’s="" marketing="" decision="" >https://t.co/N7onFbBxdG
—="" Dave="" Portnoy="" (@stoolpresidente)="" >May="" 17,="" 2026="" "="" href="https://
Do the Indiana Fever play today? Home stand continues for Caitlin Clark and squadClark continues delivering despite outside noise
While the online discourse exploded, Clark continued doing what she has consistently done since entering the league: producing. The Fever star has once again opened the season among the WNBA’s statistical leaders while continuing to drive unprecedented fan attention around the sport. She entered Sunday averaging 25 points and eight assists per game while helping keep Indiana at the center of the league conversation nearly every night.
Clark’s rise has transformed the visibility of the WNBA over the last two seasons. Television audiences, ticket demand, road attendance, merchandise sales, and social engagement have all surged during her arrival into the league. That is why moments like Sunday’s graphic instantly become larger discussions about how the WNBA markets its biggest stars and how the league wants to present itself publicly during one of the most visible periods in its history.
Whether the omission was intentional, accidental, or simply a creative choice, the reaction showed one thing clearly: when Clark is not included, fans notice immediately. And increasingly, they are making sure the WNBA hears about it.

22 hours ago
3
English (US)