
Article content
(Bloomberg) — Back in December, the retraction of a key climate report was seen as proof that the economic cost of global warming had been overstated. Now, Norway’s wealth fund says its own analysis indicates that would be the wrong conclusion to draw.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
Scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research last year took down a paper that had fed into scenarios used by central banks and investors, including Norway’s $2.2 trillion wealth fund. The retraction followed criticism from scientists and academics of the paper’s methodology, and a formal review ultimately led the paper’s authors to acknowledge “substantial” issues.
Article content
Article content
Article content
But in Oslo, a team at Norges Bank Investment Management decided to dig further. As part of an ongoing analysis into the potential for climate change to result in portfolio losses, NBIM studied the review of the retracted paper as well as the criticisms of its methodology to arrive at its own assessment.
Article content
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
“At the end of this process, we still believe models tend to underestimate physical risk,” NBIM said in an email to Bloomberg, referring to the real-world fallout of rising temperatures.
Article content
The comments come as Wall Street pays less attention to climate risk, with AI disruptions, inflation and war all seen as more pressing issues than the threat of rising temperatures. For insurers and pension funds, meanwhile, the fallout of a hotter planet is proving increasingly hard to ignore.
Article content
The Oslo-based wealth fund said last year that most scenarios available to investors still “severely underestimate” the physical impacts of climate change. Unless global greenhouse gas emissions peak very soon and then fall significantly, the economic costs associated with physical climate risks will accelerate, with potential tipping points threatening to make outcomes even worse, NBIM said.
Article content
Article content
There’s growing evidence that the financial cost of climate change is rising. The European Environment Agency estimates that economic losses tied to global warming reached €208 billion ($245 billion) in the European Union between 2021 and 2024. That’s 24 times greater than estimated climate losses in the 1980s and more than 10 times the level of the 2010-2019 period, the data show.
Article content
The economic cost of a hotter planet is also altering the way in which some corners of the financial markets operate. In insurance and reinsurance, for example, an ever greater share of risk is being transferred to capital markets in the form of catastrophe bonds. That’s coincided with the annual cost of natural disasters regularly exceeding the historical norm.
Article content
And studies by the European Central Bank and the Central Bank of Ireland have found that debt markets are increasingly charging issuers more based on their perceived ability to transition to a low-carbon economy. There’s also evidence that private market investors are increasingly alert to such risks. Last year, Apollo Global Management Inc. told Bloomberg it was building out its risk review process to reflect the impact on asset valuations of extreme weather.

1 hour ago
3
English (US)