New Research: 77% of Executives Say Managers Are Prepared to Guide AI Skills Development, While 91% of Employees Disagree

Article content

Article content

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Acorn, the AI-powered performance enablement learning management platform, today released The 2026 State of Learning for AI Fluency Report, revealing a significant disconnect in organizational AI readiness across a survey of more than 1,200 professionals. While 77% of executives believe their managers are prepared to guide AI skills development, 91% of employees say their managers lack that preparation. This structural disconnect explains why organizations are not seeing meaningful gains in skills despite heavy investment in AI training. The study shows that this manager preparedness failure sits at the intersection of three interconnected challenges: organizations lack role-level capability standards, managers lack the frameworks and confidence to guide development conversations, and employees are losing faith that either will change.

Article content

Article content

Article content

“What this research makes clear is that there are two workforces experiencing the same AI deployment from fundamentally different positions,” said Blake Proberts, CEO and Founder of Acorn. “The deficiency in manager preparedness highlights a measurement infrastructure problem. Managers can’t guide development conversations they have no evidence to anchor on, and without that evidence, employees default to skepticism.”

Article content

Article content

Organizations Are Investing in AI Without Building the Infrastructure to Support It

Article content

Development plans are commonplace, but remain largely ineffective. Nearly six in ten organizations are currently running development programs they consider insufficient: 58% report their development plans are somewhat, not very or not at all effective at improving performance and building capability. Capability in this report is defined as the combination of personal and technical skills, knowledge, processes, tools and behaviors essential to an organization’s success and future needs.

Article content

The core issue is that organizations are tracking activity, not capability. Before AI, organizations already struggled to connect learning investment to measurable outcomes:

Article content

Article content

The same problem is now playing out with AI. Organizations are deploying AI tools into a workforce with no agreed definition of what AI capability looks like at the role level:

Article content

Article content

“It is clear AI adoption has outpaced enablement,” said Keith Metcalfe, President of Acorn. “We see companies throwing budget at AI without giving their employees the guidance and support required to effectively use it in their roles. The result is an overly confident C-suite and a directionless employee base that is struggling to make sense of AI directives.”

Article content

Article content

Managers Are Unprepared and Executives Don’t Realize It

Article content

Managers play a key role in AI strategy and individual skill development, but the data shows they are under-equipped for the task, and leadership isn’t aware it’s a problem.

Article content

Seventy-five percent of individual contributors report their managers are only somewhat prepared or not prepared to have meaningful conversations about traditional skills and 54% of managers agree. Eighty percent of C-suite respondents say their managers are very prepared to have meaningful conversations with employees about their capabilities, including where an employee needs to develop and what ‘good’ looks like.

Article content

AI has made this manager preparedness failure and disconnect more acute:

Article content

Article content

“Without consistent check-ins, clear role-level standards and managers equipped to have meaningful development conversations, these plans have no impact,” said Proberts. “What’s missing is a capability layer that connects learning to performance.”

Article content

Employees Are Losing Confidence While Organizations Claim Readiness

Article content

The disconnect between executive confidence and employee reality is creating workplace anxiety and eroding the credibility of organizational AI readiness efforts: 58% of individual contributors are slightly skeptical and 28% are scared or disillusioned, which contrasts sharply with 82% of executives who report being excited about AI.

Article content

Nearly 60% of employees lack confidence applying AI in their role. Among those who have used AI tools, many remain ineffective:

Article content

Article content

Looking ahead, the outlook is bleak. Overall, 61% of respondents are not confident or only somewhat confident their organization’s current approach will prepare the workforce for AI-driven role changes over the next three years.

Article content

The C-suite, however, tells a different story. Almost 80% of executives are very confident their AI competency approach will prepare the workforce. However, 41% of individual contributors express zero confidence, a 65-point chasm that reflects something deeper than skepticism. Employees, the people these programs are designed for, do not believe they will work.