Joint Statement from Canada’s Education Leaders In Opposition to the Use of the Notwithstanding Clause in Labour Negotiations

1 hour ago 3

Article content

BANFF, Alberta, June 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Teacher organization presidents from across Canada, representing more than 420,000 educators, met in Banff, Alberta, on June 1, 2026, to discuss the potential use of the Notwithstanding Clause (Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms) by provincial/territorial governments for issues it was never intended for, as it has been in Alberta. 

Financial Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

The presidents affirmed their shared commitment to the democratic rights of teachers and all workers and stand united in their condemnation of the use of the Notwithstanding Clause as a tool to override constitutionally protected rights to freedom of association, collective bargaining, and strike action. 

Article content

Article content

Article content

A Growing Pattern of Overreach 

Article content

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

The Notwithstanding Clause was designed as a safeguard to be invoked only in exceptional and demonstrably justified circumstances. It was never intended to be a routine tool for governments to bypass the courts and silence workers amid legitimate labour disputes. 

Article content

In the past five years, the Notwithstanding Clause has been used more frequently to deny human and democratic rights than at any other time in our lifetimes. Recently, Premiers in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Quebec have invoked the Notwithstanding Clause in the following legislation: 

Article content

  • Bill 2, “Back to School Act” in Alberta, 2025 
  • Bill 9, “Protecting Alberta’s Children Statutes Amendment Act” in Alberta, 2025 
  • Bill 137, “Parents’ Bill of Rights” in Saskatchewan, 2023 
  • Bill 28, “Keeping Students in Class Act” in Ontario, 2022 
  • Bill 307, “Protecting Elections and Defending Democracy Act” in Ontario, 2021 
  • Bill 96, “An Act respecting French, the official and common language of Québec” in Quebec, 2022 

Article content

When governments invoke the Notwithstanding Clause to end labour disputes, they are not simply legislating. They are telling workers that their rights are conditional and that the Charter protections all Canadians depend upon can be switched off when it is politically convenient to do so. This is a threat not only to teachers, but to every worker and every citizen in this country. 

Article content

Article content

Our Collective Position 

Article content

The undersigned presidents, representing teachers and education workers in every province and territory across Canada, collectively and unequivocally declare: 

Article content

  • The use of the Notwithstanding Clause during labour negotiations is an abuse of legislative power. Governments must engage in good-faith collective bargaining, not weaponize the Constitution to silence workers. 
  • Teachers’ rights to freedom of association, collective bargaining, and the right to strike are constitutionally protected and must remain so. No government should be able to pre-emptively nullify these rights and block the courts from providing recourse. 
  • The Notwithstanding Clause must only ever be used as a last resort, after judicial review has been permitted. Its pre-emptive use to shield legislation from Charter challenges is a subversion of the democratic rule of law. 
  • The implications of this trend extend far beyond education, threatening every worker and citizen in this country. What is happening to teachers today can happen to any worker, in any sector, tomorrow. This is a national issue requiring a national response. 
Read Entire Article