Does Jeremiyah Love make the Browns better? Absolutely. Can they actually afford to draft him at No. 6? That’s where the conversation gets complicated.
The rumors are swirling after Todd Monken’s comments at the NFL owners' meetings, where he doubled down on a "run-heavy" identity. Naturally, the dots are being connected to Love, a dynamic dual threat playmaker who fits the Monken mold of a versatile, pass-catching weapon out of the backfield. But as the hosts on ESPN Cleveland pointed out, the roster math just doesn’t add up for a top-ten running back.
More: Myles Garrett trade rumors: Why contract restructure makes a 'splash' deal more likely
Cleveland already invested heavily in the backfield last year, and with Quinshon Judkins expected to be full-go for camp alongside Dylan Sampson, the need at RB is more of a luxury.
Meanwhile, the gaps elsewhere are more like craters. Ignoring a blue-chip wideout like Ohio State’s Carnell Tate, a true WR1 prototype, or a foundational left tackle to protect the blindside would be a massive gamble by GM Andrew Berry.
You don't build a sustainable "run-heavy" offense by drafting the runner before the blockers. In a league where positional value is king, taking a RB sixth overall when your offensive line has glaring holes and your receiving corps needs a spark is a tough pill to swallow.
The Notre Dame alum is a special talent (21-total TDs in 2025), but the Browns can make due with the tough rushing Judkins, and scatback Sampson. Love is the right player at the wrong time. Unless Monken plans on going with a super old school 1940s run only gameplan, Berry needs to draft for need with Cleveland's pair of first round picks.
More Browns News
- 2026 NFL free agency rankings: Browns land near bottom of ESPN insider's list
- Third time's the charm? Why the Browns must sign this recently released veteran QB
- Grade for Browns offseason moves after first wave of NFL free agency
- 'Take us both!': Ty Simpson urges Browns to draft him and Carnell Tate in bold pitch to Kay Adams

1 hour ago
4
English (US)