How Minneapolis rioters are forcing Trump’s hand with the Insurrection Act

1 hour ago 2
Anti-ICE protesters confronting federal agents in Minneapolis on Jan. 15, 2026. Anti-ICE protesters confronting federal agents in Minneapolis on Jan. 15, 2026. Photo by Octavio JONES / AFP via Getty Images

If Minnesota officials don’t like President Donald Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act, maybe they should do more to tamp down the insurrectionary activity in their state. 

After an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer was violently attacked by two illegal immigrants while making an arrest Wednesday night and shot one assailant in the leg in self-defense, anti-ICE activists — predictably enough — rioted. 

In response to the unprovoked attack on the officer, Mayor Jacob Frey once again blasted ICE.

Imagine, he implored, if your city “was suddenly invaded by thousands of federal agents that do not hold the values that you hold dear.”

Minnesota’s elected officials might want to consider whether portraying federal law-enforcement officers as an alien, invading force is the best way to convince Trump that he shouldn’t resort to the Insurrection Act.  

They sound like Confederate leaders complaining about, say, the 20th Maine Infantry showing up within the city limits of Richmond, Va., in 1863.

But they can’t help themselves — this is how they think.  

State Rep. Liish Kozlowski thought Wednesday’s shooting provided more evidence that ICE officers “are not here for public safety or for fraud or for the well-being of anybody, but to hunt and harm us.” 

Prior to the latest incident, Gov. Tim Walz implored Trump to “end this occupation.”

This mindset is why Minnesota’s elected leaders have justified and encouraged a low-grade anti-ICE insurgency.

It doesn’t involve guns or bombs, but other tools of coercion and intimidation meant to make it impossible for the federal government to enforce the nation’s immigration laws in the state. 

ICE officers are operating among a hostile population, significant elements of which consider them an occupying force — and are determined to expel them. 

This is “Free Palestine” for the anti-ICE crowd. 

Apologists for the agitators say, as Rep. Ilhan Omar has maintained, that they are only recording ICE officers and holding them accountable.

This is nonsense: The activists almost always have cameras, true, but they are obstructing ICE vehicles, yelling at ICE officers, and, if the opportunity arises, trying to “de-arrest” people

The point of all of this is to create an atmosphere of violent intimidation and make every step ICE takes in the city as painful as possible.

If this is the work of “legal observers,” as the euphemism has it, the Proud Boys at the Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville in 2017 were just “historic preservationists.”

Get opinions and commentary from our columnists

Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!

Thanks for signing up!

Frey says the activists are protecting their city and looking out for their neighbors.

In no other context, though, would the mayor be claiming this. 

If, say, the FBI arrests gangbangers in Minneapolis, it’s not an assault on the Twin Cities — in fact, the opposite.

As for neighbors, anyone arrested for any crime is someone’s neighbor.

Just because the guy stealing hubcaps or dealing drugs lives in a neighborhood doesn’t mean he gets legal immunity, or that his neighbors get to try to prevent law enforcement from going after him. 

Often the “neighbors” that the activists are supposedly protecting, by the way, are other activists who have gone out of their way to interfere with ICE and have been detained.

In Trump’s first term, “the resistance” was an over-the-top term that applied to the fervent opposition to Trump, including massive street protests that were obnoxious, but lawful.

In Minnesota now, “the resistance” is a more apt phrase. 

And that’s why the Insurrection Act is in play.

It is an antiquated law with a vague trigger, allowing the president to use active-duty military forces and federalized National Guard troops to quell “unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages.” 

If Trump goes there, it would be a big deal.

It would be better, first, to try to provide more protection for ICE officers with other law-enforcement assets — and better still, if Minnesota could turn off the anti-ICE insurgency.

Last week, Jacob Frey famously told ICE to “get the f–k out of Minneapolis.”

Now, he should tell the agitators to get the f–k off the streets. 

X: @RichLowry

Read Entire Article