Global Central Banks Boost Their Holdings of Malaysia Bonds

jabqmyiumzycdin6x9nr}sg0_media_dl_1.png Bank Negara Malaysia, Bloomberg

Article content

(Bloomberg) — Foreign central banks and governments have boosted their share of Malaysian sovereign bonds, underscoring the nation’s growing appeal as a reserve asset in a volatile global environment.

Article content

The institutions owned 36% of all overseas holdings of the Southeast Asian country’s sovereign notes at end-March, the highest level in Bank Negara Malaysia data going back to 2015, and versus 29.4% in March 2025. The bonds have returned nearly 12% to dollar-based investors over the past year, outperforming all emerging-market peers in Asia.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Malaysia’s strong currency and stable economic growth have been a key allure for global investors. In recent months, the nation’s status as a net energy exporter has further enhanced the appeal of local assets, setting them apart from import dependent peers hit by the oil shock stemming from the Iran conflict.

Article content

Article content

“Ringgit government bonds offer one of the highest yields among EM Asia current-account surplus countries, and decent liquidity depth for an emerging market,” said Winson Phoon, head of fixed‑income research at Maybank Securities in Singapore. Malaysia stands out as one of the beneficiaries of a gradual shift by regional central banks to diversify reserves away from the US dollar, he added.

Article content

Malaysian government bonds have also been among the most stable among emerging Asian markets during the Middle East conflict, second only to Chinese notes, Phoon noted.

Article content

The nation’s 10-year yields have traded within a 15-basis point range since the start of the Iran war, data compiled by Bloomberg show. By comparison, yields in Indonesia, India, the Philippines, Thailand and South Korea have fluctuated by an average of 73 basis points over the same period.

Article content

Article content

Up more than 14% since the start of 2025, the ringgit remains Asia’s best-performing currency against the dollar by a wide margin. Malaysia has lifted its growth forecast for 2026 after the economy grew faster than estimated last year, overcoming challenges posed by US tariffs.

Article content

Malaysia’s exposure to the oil shock is lower relative to East Asia and Pacific peers, and it is increasingly being seen as a “safe haven” in the region, Apurva Sanghi, the World Bank’s lead economist for Malaysia, said last month.

Article content

While that relative insulation has benefited Malaysia so far, a prolonged Middle East conflict could still fuel inflationary pressures and raise subsidy costs for the government. That, in turn, could strain fiscal finances and pressure sovereign bonds.

Article content

The nation is estimated to have spent about $1.8 billion on fuel subsidies in April, roughly 10 times pre-war levels. Inflation accelerated to 1.7% in March, the fastest pace in over a year, but remained within the range that BNM has forecast for 2026.

Article content

The central bank kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 2.75% on Thursday, but warned that uncertainties surrounding the conflict will affect the outlook for growth and inflation. The ringgit was the among the top losers in Asia on Friday, as oil prices rose after renewed clashes between the US and Iran near the Strait of Hormuz undermined hopes of a peace deal.

Article content

Meanwhile, global funds have been piling into local bonds. International investors bought a net $947 million worth of notes in April, central bank data show, a second straight month of inflows.

Article content

The ringgit’s “strong performance is also benefiting the bond market, where global funds are investing in short-end bonds to capitalize on both interest rates and foreign-exchange exposure,” said Chandresh Jain, rates and FX strategist at BNP Paribas.

Article content

(Adds mention of latest US-Iran tensions in the 11th paragraph. A previous version of this story was corrected to clarify the scope of holdings.)

Article content