Economists Push Rate-Cut Expectations Into 2027, Survey Shows

ey]uodbuq}q)lyxhabns({p(_media_dl_1.png Bloomberg News survey conducted

Article content

(Bloomberg) — Economists moved back their expectation for interest-rate cuts and now see the Federal Reserve holding rates steady into the middle of next year, according to a Bloomberg News survey.

Article content

The median estimate from 35 economists polled suggested policymakers will cut rates in June 2027, and again by December of 2027, lowering the target range of their benchmark to 3% to 3.25%. In a March survey, respondents saw rates bottoming at that same level, but anticipated the reductions this year.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Only three economists expected rate increases this year. That contrasts with investors, who are betting on tighter monetary policy by October, based on pricing in federal funds futures contracts.

Article content

Article content

Regarding the upcoming June 16-17 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, there is little disagreement. Survey respondents and investors overwhelmingly expect the benchmark to remain in a range of 3.5% to 3.75%. In what will be the first gathering led by Chairman Kevin Warsh, 71% of economists said the decision is likely to be unanimous.

Article content

Much of policymakers’ debate will be focused on growing fears of persistent inflation, as a spike in energy costs slowly spreads to other goods and services. Consumer price inflation jumped by 4.2% in May from a year ago, the fastest rate of increase in more than three years. The core measure, which excludes food and energy, accelerated to 2.9%.

Article content

Since January, a growing number of Fed policymakers have been pushing to change the FOMC’s post-meeting statement to eliminate language suggesting the next rate move would be a cut. That so-called “easing bias” prompted three dissents at the last meeting in April.

Article content

Article content

Three-fourths of economists surveyed said policymakers will either change that language next week to instead signal their next adjustment is just as likely to be a hike — or remove the line in question altogether.

Article content

“The most important signal may not be what the Fed does, but what it stops saying,” said Dennis Shen, of the International School of Management in Germany. “The ‘easing bias’ that has lingered in recent policy statements now looks increasingly out of place against a backdrop of resilient labor markets and rising inflation.”

Article content

Economists’ own concerns over inflation have also increased, with 82% saying it represented a greater risk than unemployment. Not a single respondent said the labor market was the larger peril, a sharp change from December, when more than half of economists saw it that way.

Article content

Warsh Worries

Article content

Doubts about Warsh’s determination to restrain inflation persisted among economists, but the number expressing the most skeptical view declined. Asked whether the new chairman was committed to achieving the Fed’s 2% inflation target, just 6% responded with a “no,” down from 18% in March. Another 26%, however, said they were “not sure.”