.jpg)
1 hour ago
3
Article content
MONTREAL, May 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CN (TSX: CNR) (NYSE: CNI) filed comments with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) demonstrating that the amended merger application submitted by Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) still fails to meet the Board’s requirements and thus remains incomplete. CN is urging the Board to reject the amended application.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
- Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
- Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
- National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional articles per month.
- Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
- Access articles from across Canada with one account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional articles per month
- Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
CN’s filing shows that the amended application continues to omit required information regulators and stakeholders need to meaningfully assess the competitive and operational impacts of this major proposed merger. Of the three independent deficiencies the Board identified in rejecting Applicants’ first application in January 2026, the amended application meaningfully addresses only one — providing the complete Merger Agreement — while failing to remedy the other two. Applicants still have not offered meaningful competitive enhancements, falling far short of the STB’s higher burden for Class I mergers to enhance competition and meet the public interest standard.
Article content
Article content
Article content
More specifically, the Amended Application still fails to provide:
Article content
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Article content
- Complete competition analyses required by STB regulations;
- Consistent market share information across the Amended Application;
- Accurate identification of points that would go from two Class I options to one, or from three Class I options to two;
- Analyses of downstream competitive impacts from future potential rail consolidation; and
- A significant transaction application for control of the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis (TRRA).
Article content
Finally, CN highlighted the insufficiency of the Applicants’ proposed Committed Gateway Pricing (CGP) program — the sole alleged enhancement to competition. This temporary and highly limited program applies to less than one percent of U.S. rail traffic. CGP excludes major categories of traffic, including finished vehicles, intermodal shipments, unit trains, and all customers currently served by CN, CPKC, and most short lines. According to Applicants’ own expert and modeling, CGP will actually harm many shippers. Importantly, many shippers would face increases in rail shipping costs due to the CGP program, as shown in the state maps submitted with CN’s comments.
Article content
Article content
“In January, the Board gave Applicants a clear roadmap: fix three specific deficiencies and take the opportunity to improve your application. Instead of doing the work, Applicants addressed only one of three — and ignored the Board’s invitation to meaningfully improve their application altogether. Rather than provide the required competition analyses, they recycled the same flawed approach the Board already rejected. Rather than submit the required TRRA application, they deleted their prior filing and offered a vague promise in its place. And rather than propose real competitive enhancements, they doubled down on a pricing program that will harm more shippers than it helps as shown by their own expert’s study. This is not a serious effort to comply with the Board’s requirements — it is a disregard for the process and for the stakeholders who depend on it.”
Article content
— Olivier Chouc, Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer, CN
Article content
CN appreciates the STB’s commitment to conduct a thorough and fair review in this proceeding to protect rail competition, support affordable transportation options for shippers, and strengthen the resiliency of North American supply chains. CN remains confident the Board will hold Applicants to the standards required by the Board’s regulations and to reject this incomplete application.
English (US)