Bill Clinton’s Epstein file feature: Letters to the Editor — Dec. 24, 2025

NY Post readers discuss the recent Epstein file release featuring suggestive photos of former President Bill Clinton. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

The Issue: The recent Epstein file release featuring suggestive photos of former President Bill Clinton.

Well look here: Bill Clinton frolicking around Epstein Island with young girls (“Bill’s in hot water over pics,” Dec. 20)?

Who’d’a thunk? Dirtbags hang with dirtbags, and it’s tough to find two bigger dirtbags than Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. Remember: This is the man who “did not inhale,” and “did not have sex with that woman” and did not engage in any degenerate activity on Epstein’s island.

We are not fools, Bill. We know you.

If any Americans still believe you had nothing to do with Epstein’s “suicide,” then yeah, they are truly fools. Now disappear, and take Hillary with you, Bill.

Keith LePage

Huntington

Raise your hand if you believe that Clinton, who stuck a cigar into the nether region of a young intern in the Oval Office, never discussed with and didn’t know that his pal Epstein was preying on young girls. Yeah, and the border was secure under “Sleepy” Joe.

Jake McNicholas

Whitestone

Remember when Democrats were claiming they wanted the Epstein files released because they cared about the victims? Well, more files have been released with more pictures of Bill Clinton and, in the aftermath, it seems no one even cares about Bill Clinton. This proves, once and for all, liberals never cared about underage victims.

They hoped for salacious pictures of President Trump, but instead proved Bill would rather travel halfway around the world than sleep next to Hillary.

Matthew Nugent

Staten Island

Every year our federal government struggles with a huge national debt, resulting in shutdowns and layoffs. But Congress would rather debate less important issues like the Epstein files. Why is this relevant to the constitutional functions of our government?

Should our government be an all-seeing nanny state, punishing everyone for misconduct in their personal and private lives? The courts should be deciding about the release of the Epstein files, not Congress.

Bill Graham

Salinas, Calif.

A sex trafficker, blatant narcissist and coward is the person The Post deems newsworthy. Now, new photos that are conveniently redacted appear alongside stories of Epstein and others with young children. Is there no end to this reporting?

The world as we know it is imploding with upsetting news every day.

L. Stevenson

Marlboro, NJ

All I want for Christmas is to stop seeing perverted Jeffrey Epstein on the cover of major newspapers.

Cecelia Clark

St Petersburg, Fla.

The Issue: Susie Wiles telling Vanity Fair President Trump has an “alcoholic’s personality.”

It’s no surprise to me that Vanity Fair used White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles as a punching bag. VF, The New Yorker and New York magazine are left-leaning and will attack anyone or anything related to Trump (“ ‘Target’ed hit job on Wiles,” Miranda Devine, Dec. 18).

Like him or not, President Trump is the one saving grace we as New Yorkers have with the incoming Mamdani administration.

Alfred Bonnabel

Manhattan

It’s shocking that Wiles, among the president’s closest advisers, didn’t expect Vanity Fair, the pernicious Trump-hating vehicle, to write anything but an attack piece on anyone connected to the president. Anything less than a smear campaign would’ve come as a shock.

Wiles should’ve never given them a moment of her time. Hopefully, it’s a lesson learned.

Mitchell Schwefel

Barnegat, NJ

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to [email protected]. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.