Warsh Must Confront Risks of Dissenting in His First Fed Vote

Kevin Warsh during his Senate Banking confirmation hearing in Washington on April 21. Photographer: Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg Photo by Graeme Sloan /Bloomberg

Article content

(Bloomberg) — When Kevin Warsh hosts his first meeting as the new chair of the Federal Reserve, he’ll face an immediate dilemma: Stare down White House demands for immediate interest-rate cuts, or stare down fellow policymakers who remain skeptical of the need to ease.

Article content

The unusual starting place raises the possibility that Warsh may eventually be forced to cast a dissenting vote against his colleagues to make his case heard.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Ordinarily, the idea of a Fed chair breaking from a consensus decision at the central bank would be almost unthinkable. Paul Volcker in 1986, G. William Miller in 1978 and Marriner Eccles in the late 1930s were the only chairs to have dissented against the majority view on a policy decision.

Article content

Article content

But these aren’t ordinary times.

Article content

This week alone saw three officials disagree with the dovish tone of the Fed’s policy statement, and another who voted against the decision to hold rates steady, making it the first time since October 1992 that four officials dissented.

Article content

President Donald Trump, who nominated Warsh for the Fed role, has been scathing in his criticism of the central bank for not cutting fast enough. He’s also threatened criminal investigations, lawsuits and the firing of Fed officials.

Article content

Warsh won the race for Fed chair partly through sketching out a road map to rate cuts on the premise that an AI-driven productivity boom would keep inflation low. He’s also proposed that shrinking the Fed’s $6.7 trillion balance sheet would leave space for lower interest rates. In his confirmation hearing, Warsh even floated a new inflation framework, though he gave few details on what that would look like.

Article content

Article content

It’s not impossible that Warsh enjoys a honeymoon period in which his new colleagues grant him a near-term cut, said Jon Faust, a former special adviser to Powell. Warsh’s first policy meeting will be June 17-18.

Article content

But, Faust cautioned, it’s just as likely his new colleagues will be dead set against that. “In that case, he will only have terrible options,” he said.

Article content

The Fed’s benchmark rate is currently in a range of 3.5% to 3.75% and investors see it staying there well into 2027.

Article content

A decision by Warsh to vote against fellow policymakers would be laden with risk. It could antagonize the very people he’s hoping to win over and damage his credibility among investors. The outgoing chair, Jerome Powell, was accused several times by commentators of having “lost control” of the Federal Open Market Committee when rate decisions he led generated repeated dissents.

Article content

A Warsh dissent could also send a message to the White House that the new chair is unable to deliver the lower rates Trump is calling for. That may make it more likely that Warsh will, at first, attempt to build consensus for a rate cut.