Trade Chaos Is Part of the Plan for Trump, Nightmare for Powell

e3deruoc}bm(mgx2(numh6br_media_dl_1.png Bloomberg Economics

Article content

(Bloomberg) — Jim Tuchler, a Chicago-area retailer, and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell have a lot in common these days.

Article content

Article content

Tuchler says the turmoil around tariffs has landed him in a maddening “game of chicken,” in which he can only guess what his import-tax bill might be when it actually comes due. His e-commerce site just placed an order from China for “literally $80,000 worth of stockings,” Tuchler says. “Or is it going to cost me, like, $200,000? How does one plan a business this way?”

Article content

Article content

Scale that up, and the question facing Powell is much the same. If thousands of businesses can’t foresee input costs, or tax rates on their exports, then how can the Fed forecast the economy’s trajectory? Higher American tariffs could raise inflation. The resulting squeeze on consumers – plus retaliation by other countries — could put a dent in output, hiring and investment. And those outcomes point in opposite directions when it comes to setting interest rates.

Article content

Article content

It’s an illustration of how President’s Donald Trump’s trade war has turned global commerce into a giant black box – and not by accident.

Article content

His Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent describes Trump’s approach as “strategic uncertainty,” a nod at the idea that keeping counterparties in the dark about America’s desired endgame can help secure better deals. However that works out in trade talks, it’s a nightmare for anyone trying to map a path ahead, from businesses to central banks. 

Article content

The Fed is expected to keep rates on hold when it meets this week. Beyond that, things get murky. Trump and now Bessent too have been leaning on the central bank to start easing policy. Market expectations for a June move are creeping higher.

Article content

Article content

Michael Hanson, a senior economist at JPMorgan Research, says the house view there is for a cut in September, when the worst tariff inflation should start to recede and the labor market is likely to have weakened. But he acknowledges the unusual degree of opacity arising from the trade war on questions like whether there’ll be a US recession this year.

Article content

“It’s not immediately clear what the ultimate outcome is going to be,” says Hanson, whose team is trying to isolate the channels most impacted by tariffs — like business investment — and how inflation could erode consumption. “We talk about risks and distribution of risks.”

Article content

‘The Whole Idea’

Article content

That will be key to the Fed’s approach too. Its forecasters always have a baseline view. But this time, as they run trade shocks through their models and look at outcomes for prices, growth and employment, alternative paths are likely to carry extra weight.

Article content

“More than ever, scenario analysis is really important,” says Seth Carpenter, chief global economist at Morgan Stanley.

Article content

Policymakers and businesses seem to agree. The Bank of Canada last month published two sets of forecasts to capture different possibilities, instead of a single projection. United Airlines took the unusual step of issuing two separate profit outlooks, one based on stability and the other on a trade war-induced downturn.