Thunder just entered historic territory: Only Jordan’s Bulls and Steph’s Warriors have done this

1 hour ago 3

The Oklahoma City Thunder aren’t sneaking up on anyone anymore. They’ve officially crossed into territory that only a handful of dynasties in NBA history have ever reached; and the names they’re now sitting beside say everything about what this run has become.

With 132 wins across the last two seasons, Oklahoma City has recorded one of the five best two-year stretches the league has ever seen. That list is not filled with good teams. It’s filled with legends.

Think Chicago Bulls. Think Golden State Warriors. Now think Thunder. And suddenly, this doesn’t feel like a fun stat anymore. It feels like a warning.

Most wins in a two-season span in NBA history:

141 wins: Bulls (1995-97)
140 wins: Warriors (2015-17)
140 wins: Warriors (2014-16)
132 wins: Thunder (2024-26)
131 wins: Bulls (1996-98)

The Oklahoma City Thunder are in some elite company 👀 pic.twitter.com/lkoDp5CL6e

— ESPN Insights (@ESPNInsights) April 9, 2026

A two-year run that puts OKC in elite company

Here’s the full list of the most wins over any two-season span in NBA history:

  • 141 wins — Bulls (1995–97)

  • 140 wins — Warriors (2015–17)

  • 140 wins — Warriors (2014–16)

  • 132 wins — Thunder (2024–26)

  • 131 wins — Bulls (1996–98)

That’s it. That’s the club.

No LeBron-era teams. No Spurs dynasty. No Lakers runs outside of the 80s. Just historically dominant teams that didn’t just win; they controlled entire eras.

For Oklahoma City to land at No. 4 on that list this early in its trajectory is staggering. Even more telling, they’re doing it in an era defined by parity, load management, and deeper talent pools across the league.

This isn’t supposed to happen anymore.

MoreDerrick White is on the verge of NBA history and it perfectly captures what makes the Celtics dangerous

Why this feels bigger than just a stat

On the surface, 132 wins across two seasons is impressive. But context matters, and that’s where this becomes something much more significant. The Thunder went 68-14 last season and followed it up with a 64-16 campaign while dealing with injuries and the pressure of defending a title. That kind of sustained excellence is typically reserved for veteran superteams or established dynasties.

Oklahoma City is neither. This is still a relatively young core, led by MVP-level guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, anchored by rising stars like Chet Holmgren, and built on depth, versatility, and defensive discipline.

They don’t just beat teams. They overwhelm them with consistency. And that’s the common thread between every team on that historic list.

The dynasty question is no longer hypothetical

When you’re mentioned alongside Michael Jordan’s Bulls and Stephen Curry’s Warriors, expectations shift immediately. This is no longer about potential. It’s about legacy.

Oklahoma City has already checked several of the boxes that historically predict championships:

  • Back-to-back dominant regular seasons

  • League-best record and No. 1 seed

  • MVP-level superstar

  • Elite defensive identity

  • Depth that survives injuries

As Gilgeous-Alexander himself put it, regular-season milestones only matter if they lead to titles. But history suggests something important: teams that reach this level of sustained dominance almost always finish the job.

That’s what makes this moment feel different. The Thunder aren’t chasing greatness anymore. They’re already standing in it.

More NBA news:

Read Entire Article