Opinion: The Building Canada Act will likely make things worse, not better

Article content

At bottom, however, it allows the cabinet to go around nearly every existing hurdle impeding or preventing large projects, and the list of hurdles is extensive: Bill C-69 (which governs approvals for large infrastructure projects including pipelines); Bill C-48 (which effectively bans oil tankers off the west coast); the federal cap on greenhouse gas emissions for only the oil and gas sector (which effectively means a cap or even reductions in production); what amounts to a carbon tax on fuel (called the Clean Fuels Standard); and so on.

Article content

Bill C-5 will not change any of these laws and regulations. It will simply allow the cabinet to choose when and where they’re applied. This is cronyism at its worst and opens up the Carney government to significant risks of favouritism and even corruption.

Article content

Consider firms interested in pursuing large projects. If the bill becomes law, there won’t be a new, better, more transparent process to follow that improves the general economic environment for all entrepreneurs and businesses. Instead, firms will have to lobby the federal cabinet, i.e., a handful of politicians vested with extraordinary new powers, and try to convince them their project is in the “national interest.”

Article content

Article content

Some senators reportedly are referring to Bill C-5 as the “Trust Me” law, meaning that because there aren’t enough details and guardrails within the legislation, senators who vote for it are in effect “trusting” Prime Minister Carney and his cabinet to do the right thing, consistently over time.

Article content

Article content

Article content

Consider the ambiguity in the legislation and how it empowers discretionary decisions by the cabinet. Cabinet “may consider any factor” it “considers relevant, including the extent to which the project can … strengthen Canada’s autonomy, resilience and security” or “provide economic benefits to Canada” or “advance the interests of Indigenous peoples” or “contribute to clean growth and to meeting Canada’s objectives with respect to climate change.”

Article content

With such “criteria,” nearly anything cabinet or the prime minister can dream up could be deemed to be in the “national interest” and therefore provide the prime minister with unprecedented and near unilateral powers.

Article content

In the preamble to the legislation, the government says it wants an accelerated approval process that “enhances regulatory certainty and investor confidence.” In all likelihood, Bill C-5 will do the opposite. It will put more power in the hands of a very few members of the government, encourage cronyism, risk outright corruption and make Canada even less attractive to investment.

Article content

Niels Veldhuis and Jason Clemens are economists with the Fraser Institute.

Article content