Netflix’s Co-CEO Explains Why He Quit the Warner Bros. Fight

When Netflix Inc. dropped out of the bidding for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. on Feb. 26, the news came as a surprise to many in Hollywood.

Article content

(Bloomberg) — When Netflix Inc. dropped out of the bidding for Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. on Feb. 26, the news came as a surprise to many in Hollywood. 

Article content

Netflix had agreed to buy Warner Bros.’ studios and HBO Max streaming business in December and co-Chief Executive Officer Ted Sarandos had done a string of press appearances and meetings talking about the deal, including at the White House.

Article content

Article content

In his first interview since abandoning the pursuit, Sarandos told Bloomberg News the decision to drop out had actually been made earlier, based on various bidding scenarios Netflix had worked out in advance. 

Article content

Article content

“We knew right away, when we got the notice on Thursday that they had a superior offer and the details of that deal,” Sarandos said. “We knew exactly what we were going to do.”

Article content

Article content

Rival bidder Paramount Skydance Corp. is borrowing tens of billions of dollars to swallow a much larger company — debt that will force CEO David Ellison to cut $16 billion in costs and eliminate thousands of jobs, according to Sarandos.

Article content

“It would be less production, less people working,” he said.

Article content

Netflix’s proposed acquisition drew a lot of pushback from Hollywood labor unions, politicians and entertainment industry luminaries like director James Cameron, in part due to the company’s historical lack of support for movie theaters. But Sarandos said the conversations he’s had with film distributors over the past few months will likely lead to more Netflix pictures in cinemas. 

Article content

“I think we’re going to find a bunch of cool things to do together going forward,” he said.

Article content

While Bloomberg News and other outlets have reported that the US Justice Department is conducting a broad review of Netflix’s business practices, Sarandos said that investigation is done.

Article content

Article content

“We’re in the clear,” he said. 

Article content

Below, a transcript of the interview, which has been edited for clarity. 

Article content

When did you decide not to match the offer and what went into that decision?

Article content

Sarandos: We had a very tight range that we’d be willing to pay and made that offer back when we closed this deal. We hadn’t moved much from that, except for moving to cash, which served to move the deal faster. I’m happy where we got in and happy where we got out.

Article content

We knew right away, when we got the notice on Thursday that they had a superior offer and the details of that deal. We knew exactly what we were gonna do.

Article content

What scenarios had you planned in advance?

Article content

We had done all the scenario planning, so we didn’t have to go back to the board. We knew what we wanted to do.

Article content

There was a lot of uncertainty in their financing. What would they be willing to do on price? Would they close all those other issues, but not raise the price? Once they did what I probably didn’t expect, which was the personal guarantee for a $111 billion deal — it’s pretty unprecedented — that was clear to us. They had taken all the other issues off the table and then they additionally raised the price.

Article content

You were in DC…

Article content

By the way, they were also very clear that they were not at last and final. They were emphatic. Remember, the deal we closed on December 5th was last and final. We presented it as last and final. It was.

Article content

You were in DC the day that you pulled out, and a lot of people want to know: What did the Department of Justice say to you? What did Trump say to you? What impact did the growing political resistance have on your decision?

Article content

I don’t know that there was growing political resistance. It was a growing narrative of political resistance. But we were on a normal regulatory path. I was in DC on Thursday for a scheduled meeting with DOJ from a couple weeks ago to go through some questions about the deal. It was a very productive meeting, nothing out of the ordinary. Nothing had shifted or changed dramatically that hauled me to DC.

Article content

You and I were both there for that Senate hearing. Republicans were very outspoken against the deal. The Republican attorneys general letter came out against it. And you had the Department of Justice, which you can say was going by the book, but there were two parts of that investigation, which is somewhat abnormal.

Article content

Article content

This was completely normal. This story has been fed out for everybody, but it’s just not accurate. We were not only involved with the DOJ, we were involved with 50 regulatory bodies around the world. These things have been going exactly the way they should.

Article content

It was not a group of bipartisan AGs. It was a group of Republican AGs. This deal is approved by the Department of Justice, not by the Senate or by the committee. The president stayed completely neutral on this. The DOJ was doing what they do, and they had been quite diligent.

Article content

And you guys were ready to spend a year or two in court?

Article content

I’m very confident that we had a clear regulatory path.

Article content

And your understanding is that the DOJ inquiry is now done.

Article content

Yeah, we’re in the clear.

Article content

What was your first reaction when you saw the Susan Rice comments?

Article content

I don’t want or expect our board members to be out talking about politics ever, let alone in the middle of a deal, but they do have the right to speak, and she wasn’t speaking for Netflix.

Article content

Did you and her speak about it at all, or did the board talk about it at all?

Article content

She and I talked about it.

Article content

And did you contemplate taking her off the board because of it?

Article content

Article content

No.

Article content

When you were done with this Thursday, did you go to a bar and have a drink?

Article content

I did have a glass of wine with our DC team. The truth of it is, someone was going to lose it for a dollar. And the quicker you accepted that, the better. And it might be you, it might be them, but someone’s gonna lose it for a dollar.

Article content

Do you think the Paramount deal will get approved?

Article content

I have no idea. I wouldn’t want to speculate.

Article content

Do you think it should be approved?

Article content

It should be highly scrutinized the way I’m glad that ours was highly scrutinized. It should be looked at with every bit of the same microscope. Remember, we were asked to go and testify. David and I both were. I came.

Article content

Let’s say that the deal happens. How do you think Paramount buying Warner Bros. will impact Hollywood and the entertainment business?

Article content

This deal is dependent on a lot of cost-cutting. We were in the books of Warner Bros., and the biggest cost centers are people in productions. There’ll be cuts in excess of $16 billion. They are telling people who lend them the money that’s gonna happen in 18 months or so. It would be less production, less people working.

Article content

Why do you think you had such a hard time convincing people to take your side on that?

Article content

People really didn’t want Warner to be sold to anybody. I can understand why. The business has been brutal for the last couple of years — the pandemic, the strikes, the profit squeezing that led to a bunch of reduced production. The last thing anybody wanted was another upset in the business. And it was aimed at us, mostly, because we had the deal.

Article content

The movie theater issue cropped up again and again. Now that you aren’t buying Warner Bros., does the strategy go back to what it was? Or are you still planning to put more Netflix movies in theaters?

Article content

Everything I talked about would require us buying that theatrical distribution entity. But one thing that’s been great about it is getting to know and have open dialogue with the theater owners. I really didn’t have much reason to before.

Article content

We’ve figured out some really creative things to do together like you saw with Stranger Things and KPop Demon Hunters. We have One Piece in theaters next week in the US and Japan. I think we’re gonna find a bunch of cool things to do together going forward. I could see us doing things that we haven’t done before.

Article content

Article content

There are a lot of people online who speculated that this was the plan all along, that you would just saddle Paramount with a bunch of debt, make them overpay, and then walk away with a bunch of money.

Article content

There are easier ways to make $2.8 billion. We were deep in the regulatory process with 50 regulatory bodies around the world. We had spent a lot of time and energy. A lot of people did an incredible amount of work on this deal. I met the top 200 employees of Warner Bros., [co-CEO Greg Peters] and I did. We definitely wanted this asset. We didn’t need it.

Article content

Was the leadership team aligned the whole time? There was always this undercurrent of maybe Reed [Hastings] and Greg don’t want to do this and this was Ted’s deal.

Article content

From the beginning, Greg and I were completely aligned. Reed’s not a big fan of M&A generally, but he supported this deal from the beginning. This was an incredibly unique opportunity. It was a unique asset that was uniquely available — incredible IP, 100 years of storytelling, production capacity, the complimentary businesses of HBO and Netflix creating cost savings for consumers. I still believe in all the positives. I just believed in them up to $27.75 a share.

Article content

Article content

Why was that the ceiling? If Paramount had come back at $33 a share, I think everyone would have understood you were done. But going up only a dollar? People assumed you could easily do this.

Article content

Go back to the seven-day window, the waiver. It’s pretty unusual. We did it because they kept creating uncertainty in the market — not just in the stock market, in the market generally. People were making decisions based on trying to figure out how the outcome of this deal was gonna be. We wanted to eliminate uncertainty as quickly as we could.

Article content

I said, ‘Look, take seven days, figure out if you have a real offer, and if you do, we have a matching right.’ Go figure out if you have another offer. What we want is a hard date on the shareholder vote. So, that’s what happened.

Article content

You were dealing with an unusual other buyer.

Article content

Unusual, yeah, unusual, irrational, whatever words you want to use in that. It’ll be fascinating to see the next steps. I have been on the record a lot in the last two weeks talking about what I think the future looks like. I’m confident in our future that we’re not impacted by all that. In fact, maybe it’s to our advantage. But I hope I’m wrong for the sake of the industry.

Article content

You blamed uncertainty for the move in your stock price, but it just seems pretty clear that your shareholders did not like this deal. How did that affect your decision making?

Article content

We’ve taken short-term hits for long-term gains in our business many times in our 20 years as a public company. And they worked out pretty well.

Article content

This process caused some analysts and investors to wonder if Netflix is concerned about growth and engagement. Why tear up the strategy if things were going so well? You guys have said all along that was not the case. But how worried are you that the narrative now follows you around?

Article content

It was a risk to the narrative, but not a risk to the business. If we kept chasing, then that’s reasonable for somebody to presume that we needed it.

Article content

I’ve never been a fan of midnight deal fever — auctions that people in the entertainment business like. Go to Sundance and they’re up until two o’clock in the morning negotiating over a $10 million film. It seems pretty silly.

Article content

Someone we both know asked me yesterday if I thought the last few months would hurt your reputation at all.

Article content

If we didn’t take a big swing every once in a while, we didn’t take advantage of an opportunity when it was in front of us because we were trying to manage our reputation instead of managing our business, that would be bad. It should reinforce our reputation of being disciplined shepherds of our shareholders’ capital.

Article content

Article content

Shares of a couple other companies popped up when you guys didn’t get this deal. Is there a world in which you guys go after another studio in the next 6 to 12 months?

Article content

Unlikely. We are builders, not buyers. All that is still true.

Article content

So how are you going to use that $2.8 billion?

Article content

Just keep investing in the business.

Article content

Paramount’s a pretty big supplier for you guys. Warner Bros. is as well. Do you worry that they’ll sell less to you?

Article content

If they are six or seven times levered, they need to make some money, and we’re buyers. So I can’t imagine that’s going to be a problem.

Article content

Is the combination of Paramount Plus and HBO Max suddenly the stiffest competition you have?

Article content

One and a half and one and a half still equals three.

Article content

You’re talking about the share of streaming viewing on Nielsen.

Article content

Yeah. I wish them luck. They’ve got regulatory hurdles to clear. Even when we were thinking about keeping these businesses together and running, we knew that we had a difficult task ahead of integration. I can’t imagine doing all that and trying to cut billions and billions of dollars. Today, Paramount has half of the people that they had one year ago. So that gives you some sense of where this is heading for the town and for the business.

Article content

Article content

So when you see David Ellison at the Oscars in a couple of weeks, you’ll shake hands?

Article content

We were just at the Super Bowl together.

Article content

Because you haven’t had a lot of regulatory scrutiny like this … Do you think there will be more focus on you now?

Article content

No, the best thing about the Senate hearing was a lot of folks in the government learned a lot more about us than they knew before, including that we make content for everybody. If our primary objective was agenda-led, we would be very small. We make content for everybody.

Article content

What’s going on with the federal tax incentive?

Article content

I’m a fan. It’s not that popular politically, but I really think that we should make sure that the country is competitive in every industry that we compete in.

Article content

Every time I’ve talked to the president, we talked about what we’re building in New Jersey. California is not that competitive. The US, without a federal incentive, is not that competitive. The New Jersey incentive is a blueprint for how it should work. I would love there to be a federal incentive that you could lay on top of the state incentives.

Article content

Now you can go back to not having there be a story every time you have a meeting with the president.

Article content

From the beginning of this, I know there was a very sexy idea that he was gonna make the call. It was never the case. It was very clear from our first discussion that he never intended that to be the case.

Article content

But the president has made a habit of using transactions as a way of asking for things. And I do think that the political pressure, even if it was noise, it spooked a lot of Warner Bros. shareholders.

Article content

It’s a lot cheaper to make noise than it is to actually raise your bid. So they tried that path first. Once it was clear that we weren’t in the CNN business, it was a lot less interesting. He didn’t care that much more about our deal.

Article content

Do you feel like this deal was a distraction?

Article content

It was all-in with the folks that were working on it, but not a distraction from the core business. And that was by design.

Article content

If you feel like this is a rare asset, that also means that an asset like this may not come up again anytime soon, right?

Article content

Possibly. Or if you look at the history of Warner Bros….

Article content