Long Island school board accused of ‘blatant corruption’ — by own member — over Thunderbirds ‘Mascotgate’

This bird doesn’t fly.

A Connetquot school board meeting turned contentious when one trustee accused her colleagues of trying to strong-arm a backdoor deal to modify their Thunderbirds team name, while also claiming members withheld critical information from the public.

“In my two years of service, I’ve never witnessed such blatant corruption carried out to serve personal and self-interested agendas,” board member Jacquelyn DiLorenzo shockingly said during a July meeting on Long Island.

“I cannot, in good conscience, make an irreversible decision that could strip future boards and future generations of their right to determine their own path,” she added.

The district has been under fire from Albany over a 2023 statewide ban on Native American mascots and logos, which it initially fought in court along with other Long Island districts. Schools that are non-compliant with the ban risk loss of state funding and removal of board members.

More recently, however, the Connetquot district quietly communicated to the state Education Department that it had, since around 2020, been allocating at least $23 million for a logo change.

Both entities decided in late June to propose to condense Thunderbirds into the already in-use T-Birds. The compromise came just days before Sec. of Education Linda McMahon announced a federal probe over the deal, which her office says may violate Title VI of the federal Civil Rights Act.

However, Jaquelyn Napolitano-Furno, a six-year trustee who stepped down this month, is irate over the backroom deal, as T-Birds was initially considered an unacceptable replacement.

“Mascot-gate is unfolding in Connetquot because the School Board decided to defy the will of the people,” Napolitano-Furno told The Post Monday.

“For four years, [T-Birds] was derogatory, and now it’s not derogatory,” she previously said.

DiLorenzo also pointed to “multiple community surveys” that blatantly show taxpayer interest in continuing the fight rather than kowtowing to the mandate.

Both DiLorenzo and Napolitano-Furno said that the school board was reluctant to publicize the data last month and blasted the lack of transparency over the multimillion-dollar issue.

The board’s reasoning, according to DiLorenzo, is “for the sake of saving their own trustee seats.”

Napolitano-Furno spoke to The Post about the issue in late June, adding that at least one survey showed 60% of residents wanted to continue the legal battle for Thunderbirds.

“Worse, [the board] ignored the rest of the survey suggestions … because it doesn’t fit the narrative they’ve already decided on,” DiLorenzo added. “They’ve asked for your input through surveys they never intended to honor — unless the results gave them political cover.”

She also said that Napolitano-Furno, who remains an individual plaintiff in a lawsuit to retain Thunderbirds, “has been relentlessly pressured to drop her case” by the board as a means to instead move forward with the T-Bird compromise.

“The pressure didn’t stop, not even during her daughter’s graduation,” said DiLorenzo, who is also personally in favor of keeping the Thunderbirds.

Napolitano-Furno, who spoke at the July meeting, was informed that an emergency session would have been held in June to approve the deal — outside of public view — had she changed her position.

“It’s disgraceful and sad to see Connetquot blatantly violate Title VI,” said Napolitano-Furno’s attorney, Oliver Roberts.

DiLorenzo, who said she fought tooth and nail to have the board release survey information, also firmly believes that the public must be further involved.

“If change ever becomes unavoidable, it should be done with full community involvement,” she said.

“Not through backdoor assumptions.”