KJ Biermann’s cellphone confiscated by parents over a year before sodomy and sexual battery arrest

17 hours ago 4

KJ Biermann’s cellphone became the subject of a bitter divorce court dispute between his parents more than a year before prosecutors said investigators found disturbing videos on the teen’s device.

Page Six has not independently confirmed any connection between the two events or what, if anything, his parents Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann knew about the contents of the phone at the time.

On Feb. 18, 2025, Zolciak, 48, claimed in a motion for an emergency hearing in Fulton County that her estranged husband, 41, had taken possession of their children’s cellular devices and restricted her access to the kids after he made a “discovery” that remains redacted from the public documents.

The reality star also filed a heavily redacted motion for an in-camera inspection, which is a private review of evidence by a judge, that same day.

The filing itself does not identify what she felt needed to be reviewed. However, a later filing dated Feb. 21, 2025, in Cobb County, Georgia, where the couple’s divorce case was moved to, referenced the order regarding the inspection of their “eldest child’s cellular telephone, and the data thereon, which had been the subject of the in-camera inspection motion.”

The couple share 4 children: KJ, 15, Kane, 14, and twins Kash and Kaia, 12.

In 2025 emergency motion, Zolciak, pictured with her former husband Kroy, claims the former Atlanta Falcon confiscated their children’s cell phones and restricted her access to the kids. kimzolciakbiermann/Instagram
Zolciak also filed a motion for an in-camera Inspection of the“eldest child’s cellular telephone, and the data thereon” (KJ, pictured earlier this year, is the couple’s eldest child). kimzolciakbiermann/Instagram

The Motion for Emergency Hearing filed by Zolciak claims that on Feb. 7, 2025, Kroy informed a court-appointed, neutral mental health professional about a discovery that remains redacted from the filing.

“In protecting the best interests of the children, Mother will not put into this public pleading what is alleged to be on REDACTED,” the motion states.

The filing goes on to claim that Kroy “began battening down the hatches,” writing that he “unilaterally directed Mother that she would no longer have parenting time with any of the children, took possession of the children’s phones, and prohibited the children from communicating with Mother.”

“Mother has had extremely limited parenting time, and Mother has grave concerns for the children’s safety and wellbeing, as well as the preservation of evidence which may be (or may have been) stored REDACTED,” the filing continues.

Kim, pictured with sons KJ and Kash in 2023, stated in her court filing that it is in the children’s best interest the redacted information not be made public. kimzolciakbiermann/Instagram
Kim, pictured with KJ last year, added that she “has grave concerns for the children’s safety and wellbeing” as well as concerns over evidence preservation. kimzolciakbiermann/Instagram

Want more celebrity and pop culture news?

Start your day with Page Six Daily.

Thanks for signing up!

The two filed a joint statement of dismissal for the divorce proceedings in Fulton County, before refiling in Cobb County.

The former couple agreed that their attorneys would seek an order governing the handling and inspection of their “eldest child’s cellular telephone, and the data thereon,” which the document said had been the subject of the Feb. 18, 2025, in-camera inspection motion.

The following month, the court entered an order sealing documents related to the matter. No subsequent mention of the results of the inspection is publicly available.

Representatives and lawyers for KJ, Kim, and Kroy did not return request for comment on this story.

KJ, pictured in a mugshot from last month, had his cell phone become the focal point of a legal battle in his parents’ divorce Alpharetta Police Department
All subsequent documents related to KJ’s phone were sealed in Cobb County Superior Court. Instagram

KJ was indicted earlier this month by a grand jury in Georgia on seven total charges — aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, three counts of aggravated sexual battery against a child under 16 and false imprisonment.

He has been held at Atlanta’s Metro Regional Youth Detention Center since his Aug. 17 arrest.

The charges stem from KJ’s alleged acts against a victim under the age of 16 on April 23, at a Life Time Fitness in Alpharetta, Georgia.

KJ’s lawyer, Jason Sheffield, has denied the claims against his client in a statement obtained by Page Six, stating that the teen “is not only presumed innocent, but is, in fact, innocent. I’m asking the public not to presume the truth of these allegations and to give the families on both sides their space and privacy.”

Kim has also maintained her son’s innocence in a statement to Page Six, saying, “The allegations being made against my son are nothing short of reckless and deeply troubling.”

She continued, “We remain confident that the facts and evidence will establish the truth, and we ask that people allow the proper process to take its course rather than spreading unproven allegations.”

Kroy has not publicly spoken on the allegations against his son.

Kim, spotted with daughter Brielle Biermann last friday at KJ’s first court appearance, called the allegations against her son “deeply troubling.” Christopher Oquendo for Page Six
Kroy, pictured last month, has issued no public comments about the situation. BACKGRID

KJ appeared in his first court appearance on Friday, where the prosecution claimed videos were found on the teen’s phone allegedly showing him having sex with an underage family member.

The Georgia judge on the case granted KJ $200,000 bond. Once released, KJ must stay at his mom’s home, attend school virtually, abstain from social media and avoid cellphone use.

He is also barred from contact with the alleged victim, her family or associates, as well as anyone 16 or younger, and will be subject to electronic monitoring.

Sheffield said in a statement obtained by Page Six, “The matter arose from inappropriate, crude behavior involving two middle-schoolers. It did not result in an adjudication for statutory rape, sexual intercourse, or any comparable offense.”

Welcome to the Page Six Community!

Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas in a safe space.

In order to do so, we've created a simple set of rules that will improve your experience.

Simply put, keep it civil.

Your post will/might be rejected if it contains:

  • Spam
  • Insults, profanity, incoherent, obscene or inflammatory language and threats of any kind
  • Attacks on the identity of other commenters or the article's author

User accounts will/might be blocked if we notice:

  • Continuous attempts to re-post comments that have been previously moderated/rejected
  • Racist, sexist, or homophobic comments
  • Attempts or tactics that put the site security at risk

So, how can you be a power user?

  • Stay on topic and share your passion. Feel free to elaborate to get your point across.
  • 'Like' or 'Dislike' when you are filled with emotions!
  • Protect your community. Use the report tool to alert us when someone breaks the rules.

Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Don't forget, freedom of speech is not the freedom of reach!

Read Entire Article