Howard Levitt: Doug Ford is right — remote work was a temporary stopgap, not a permanent entitlement

2 hours ago 2
Ontario Premier Doug Ford ordered the province’s 60,000 public servants back to the office four days a week.Ontario Premier Doug Ford ordered the province’s 60,000 public servants back to the office four days a week. Photo by Mike Hensen/The London Free Press/Postmedia Network files

Article content

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has done what too many timid CEOs refuse to do: he ordered the province’s 60,000 public servants back to the office. Four days a week. No excuses.

Financial Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or

Article content

Predictably, the public sector unions are howling. But the law — and common sense — is on Ford’s side.

Article content

Article content

The myth of permanent remote work

Article content

Remote work was never a contractual right. It was a temporary COVID-19 emergency measure that became an accommodation that employees have clung to as though it were enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is not. Unless your contract explicitly guarantees remote work, your employer can recall you. Period.

Article content

Article content

Employees talk about “work-life balance” and “autonomy.” Courts talk about contracts. And unless your contract says otherwise, the company office is your workplace.

Article content

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Article content

Why constructive dismissal doesn’t apply

Article content

Constructive dismissal arises when an employer unilaterally changes a fundamental term of employment. But returning employees to the office is not a “change.” It is a restoration of the original deal.

Article content

Contrast that with the case of Byrd v. Welcome Home Children’s Residence Inc., in which an employer let an employee work from Europe for over a year and then suddenly told her to return or quit. The court rightly ruled that remote work had, by then, become a term of her employment.

Article content

Ford’s call — like any employer’s well-communicated policy — is the opposite. It’s not a capricious ultimatum. It’s a general rule, applied across the board, with clear notice. That is entirely defensible in law.

Article content

Where employers lose

Article content

Too many employers have been weak-kneed in handling their return-to-work (RTW) policies. For example, they:

Article content

  • Make vague verbal promises. (Courts ignore those.)
  • Issue “return or resign” ultimatums. (That’s how you hand an employee a constructive dismissal claim.)
  • Pretend they can ignore the human rights elements (such as medical or family-care accommodations).

Article content

Article content

These are the ways in which you end up in court or human rights tribunals.

Article content

Article content

The solution is simple: write it down, communicate it clearly and stick to it. Hybrid and remote arrangements should always be documented, with the employer reserving the right to modify or end them. That is how you avoid litigation.

Article content

Why offices still matter

Article content

Ford is not just indulging in nostalgia. The benefits of in-office work are undeniable and include:

Article content

  • Mentorship: You cannot replicate the casual coaching that happens in a hallway or cafeteria conversation over Zoom.
  • Collaboration: Real brainstorming happens around a table, not in a pixelated box.
  • Corporate culture: Slack chats do not build loyalty. Shared spaces and shared experiences do.
  • Economic revitalization: Offices fuel restaurants, retailers, transit and the tax base. Empty downtowns are not just bad optics — they are an economic blight and create the need for tax increases.

Article content

Employers who want compliance should make the office worth coming to: schedule social events, encourage team building and restore the sense of shared purpose that remote work eroded.

Read Entire Article