Edison Gets Mixed Rulings on Bid to Shift Blame for LA Fire

Article content

(Bloomberg) — A judge rejected Southern California Edison’s attempt to shift blame to Los Angeles County for allegedly failing to ensure timely evacuation alerts that the company says could have saved most of the 19 people who died in a massive wildfire last year.

Article content

But the state judge said the utility can pursue its claims that the county created a “dangerous condition” by failing to prevent overgrown vegetation in the Pasadena area where the Eaton Fire ignited in January 2025.

Article content

Article content

Article content

SoCal Edison, a subsidiary of Edison International, faces suits from more than 10,000 plaintiffs over claims that its power equipment sparked the fire that killed at least 19 people and destroyed more than 9,400 structures.

Article content

Article content

Edison, in turn, brought claims against several local government agencies, including Los Angeles County, as well as private entities, complaining of fumbled evacuation warnings, insufficient water for firefighting and unmaintained vegetation in fire-prone areas.

Article content

A spokesperson for the utility on Wednesday hailed the judge’s finding that the county can be sued for overgrown brush and said the company disagrees with rulings that went against it. The Los Angeles County counsel’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Article content

Edison shares were up about 0.24% at 12:40 p.m. New York time in trading Thursday.

Article content

In a January filing, the utility said “many factors and causes contributed to the severity of the fire and the resulting damage” and pointed the finger at the Los Angeles sheriff’s department, the cities of Pasadena and Sierra Madre, several local water companies and a regional gas utility.

Article content

Article content

Last January’s Eaton and Palisades wildfires collectively killed more than 30 people and resulted in insured losses totaling $40 billion, making them the costliest catastrophe of 2025, according to insurer Swiss Re AG. Utilities like Edison are increasingly at risk of facing billions of dollars in exposure from fires, and they have sought to limit those liabilities in court as well as through statewide lobbying efforts to spread wildfire-related costs.

Article content

In court filings, Los Angeles County denied it was at fault for damage from the Eaton Fire, which it said arose “solely from Edison’s violation of a non-delegable obligation to maintain safe electrical infrastructure.”

Article content

The county also tried to deflect blame for dried weeds and shrubs that helped fuel the fire. “Dry vegetation is a natural condition of unimproved public land and, not a ‘defect,’” lawyers for the county wrote in a filing. They also argued the utility’s complaint was vague because it referred to a 4,000-square mile area.

Article content

But Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Laura Seigle said in a June 30 ruling that Edison can proceed with its claim, saying the company “adequately” alleged a dangerous condition and a nuisance created by brush in the Eaton Canyon area.