California’s ‘Bridge to Nowhere’ has cost you $77M so far — but expert says that’s just the start

The man running to become California’s top financial auditor has slammed a $114 million wildlife crossing dubbed the ”bridge to nowhere” as just another example of wasted cash — and warned there is more pain to come for long-suffering taxpayers.

The Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing was pitched as a once-in-a-generation conservation fix to allow safe passage for wildlife in the Santa Monica Mountains and the Simi Hills over the 101 Freeway.

Gov. Gavin Newsom said California had committed $54 million when he broke ground on the crossing in 2022, and said another $10 million would complete the project, which would also be funding by philanthropists.

The bridge was inspired by the outpouring of grief surrounding the death of the “Hollywood Lion”, P22, famously pictured in front of the iconic sign in 2012, who died from injuries suffered after being hit by a car attempting to cross the 101.

By 2025, that figure had hit $92 million and could soar to a whopping $114 million, with taxpayers contributing $77 million so far, a $21 million overrun.

The crossing is back in the public consciousness after a Post opinion piece by senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, Christopher F. Rufo, and investigative reporter Kenneth Schrupp calling out the cost blow out went viral this week.

Herb Morgan, who is a candidate for state controller, California’s chief fiscal watchdog responsible for auditing government spending and tracking taxpayer dollars, said the bridge was a case study in Sacramento’s runaway spending.

“If it’s not the bridge, it’s the train to nowhere. If it’s not the train to nowhere, it’s homelessness spending,” he said.

Morgan, an investment professional with nearly four decades in financial markets, says the issue goes far beyond a single bridge.

“The bridge is just this week’s example,” he told The Post.

The Post contacted Controller Malia Cohen for details on any audits or oversight tied to the project, but did not receive a response.

A request for comment was also sent to the governor’s office.

While not dismissing the value in the wildlife crossing, Morgan zeroed in on both the price tag, and the lack of accountability about spending, with the bridge set to be the most expensive ever built in California.

“If the legislature believes a wildlife bridge is a good thing, I actually agree,” he said. “But you don’t need to spend $114 million.”

Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing’s spokeswoman and environmental activist Beth Pratt took to Facebook to argue that commentary about the bridge missed ”missed key facts and painted an incomplete picture.”

“The cost increases we experienced are consistent with increases construction projects are facing across the country,” she wrote, citing federal data showing highway construction costs have jumped 67% since 2021.

She also rejected alternatives like relocating mountain lions and downplayed delays, saying the project had faced setback tied to record flooding but was ”now back on track.”

However, Morgan says the spending oversight gap is statewide and needs to be closely looked at.

“We’re pretty good at pushing money out the door in California,” he said. “But what we fail to do is hold the recipients of that money accountable.”

Morgan said he recently spoke with two mayors from mid-sized cities and pressed them on oversight.

“Have you ever been audited or contacted by the State Controller’s Office?’” Morgan said. “Both said no.”

He says nonprofits receiving state money are operating under the same radar. “I’ve talked to several NGOs,” Morgan said. “Never verify. Never required proof.”

“In the private sector, if I’m on a board and serve on the audit committee, it takes six to eight months working with management and auditors to ensure the books are clean,” he said.

“In the public sector, that doesn’t happen.”

Morgan says the authority to crack down already exists, but isn’t being used.

“What we lack is the will to stop theft.”

He points to fraud cases tied to public spending, arguing the pattern is bigger than any one project.

“When I looked at recent cases, none were prosecuted by the state attorney general, all were federal,” he said. “On average, about 70% of the funds were taken.”

To Morgan, the wildlife crossing isn’t just a bridge. It’s a spotlight. A high-profile project. A ballooning price tag. And, he says, a system that spends first, and asks questions later.

“I’m sure labor agreements and special interests were all over that bridge project,” he said. It’s a broken business model.”