As Elliott Moves In, BP Investment Case Splits ESG Fund Market

A BP Plc petrol station in Pretoria, South Africa, on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025. South Africa's central bank lowered borrowing costs for a third straight meeting, while warning that risks to the inflation outlook have increased. Photographer: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg Photo by Waldo Swiegers /Bloomberg

Article content

(Bloomberg) — As Elliott Investment Management pressures BP Plc to abandon its renewable-energy ambitions, ESG fund managers can’t agree on how to treat the UK oil giant. 

Article content

Article content

BP’s pledge to beef up investments in oil and gas — and slash its commitments to renewable energy — has coincided with ESG fund inflows into the company of $200 million since late February. ESG fund outflows from BP, meanwhile, were $315 million, resulting in net withdrawals of $115 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 

Article content

Article content

Money managers who say BP still belongs in an ESG portfolio include Legal & General Investment Management, which added BP to its Climate Action Global Equity fund in September and has held on to the stake despite the company’s pivot away from its climate commitments.

Article content

Article content

“We’ve seen some backpedalling,” said Nick Stansbury, manager of the fund and head of climate solutions at Legal & General. “But that is in the context of an awful lot of backpedalling everywhere else.”

Article content

Stansbury said that “what matters isn’t only the absolute sustainability performance of a company, but its performance relative to other companies.”

Article content

Elliott has now built up a stake in BP to just over 5%, making it one of the oil major’s biggest investors along with BlackRock Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc. Elliott has made clear it wants BP to return to its core oil and gas business as part of a strategy to generate $20 billion of annual free cash flow by 2027.

Article content

Against that backdrop, BP has embarked on a major pivot within its energy strategy. The company said on Feb. 26 it was abandoning earlier transition plans, and will instead seek to increase investment in oil and gas to about $10 billion a year. It also plans to reduce annual investment in low-carbon energy to $1.5 billion to $2 billion, which is roughly $5 billion less than BP’s previous guidance. 

Article content

Article content

Since BP’s announcement, more than 60 funds that commit to a sustainability objective in their prospectus have added to their existing stakes in the company, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. A further six such environmental, social and governance funds invested in BP’s stock for the first time.

Article content

The ESG investment industry’s biggest purchase of BP shares since late February was made by Franklin Templeton’s Investment fund (Ticker: TEMGGRI LX), which added 3.2 million shares, Bloomberg data show.

Article content

A spokesperson for Franklin Templeton hasn’t responded to a request for comment. 

Article content

BP’s decision to mount a full-throated retreat from the green transition while boosting investments in oil and gas has enraged climate activists and drawn criticism from a number of pension funds with sustainable investing policies, including Nest in the UK and Sampension in Scandinavia. 

Article content

The ESG fund industry has long struggled to reach a consensus on how to handle fossil-fuel companies. Many fund managers tout years-long engagement strategies they say will ultimately drive oil and gas producers to decarbonize. But the retreat from climate goals by BP and other oil majors indicates those efforts are having little impact.